The COVID-19 crisis is severely straining African economies, threatening to undermine decades of progress and jeopardize long-term goals, including economic transformation. But there are certain policy measures that, if prioritized, can help economies rebound more quickly after the immediate crisis and keep the transformation agenda on track.
As Africa entered a new decade, there was sustained, if not vibrant, optimism for the future. Many of the continent’s economies were continuing to grow, while poverty was continuing to decline. In 2019, regional growth was 2.4 percent and as of March 2019 more Africans were escaping extreme poverty than falling (or being born) below the poverty line. But the pandemic inflicted severe strain on governments and economies in 2020, resulting in Sub-Saharan Africa’s first recession in 25 years. The 6.1 percent decline in per capita income in the region was the deepest contraction on record, according to the World Bank. The lasting effects will pose dire challenges to Africa’s growth trajectory and transformation agenda.
Many African governments quickly enacted “stay at home” measures and emergency fiscal and monetary policies. For example, Ghana committed $100 million to support preparedness and response, and another $166 million to support selected industries, while the South Africa Reserve Bank has reduced the policy rate by 100 bps to 5.25 percent and announced measures to ease liquidity conditions. To support these efforts, the African Union and the Economic Commission for Africa are tracking policy measures and providing advice, while the African Development Bank floated a $3 billion “Fight COVID-19” social bond. The international community is also responding with various measures of emergency relief such as loans and grants, while the G20 agreed to temporarily halt debt payments for the world’s poorest countries.
However, even after the immediate COVID-19 crisis abates and the necessary economic and social adjustments are made, African governments and their development partners must ensure that Africa’s transformation agenda—which is critical to the continent’s long-term sustainable and equitable growth—is not permanently derailed. In fact, governments should use the urgency of the COVID-19 crisis to make meaningful policy changes that will not only help in the short term but also strengthen the long-term recovery efforts.
Emergency situations often create opportunities for lasting reform. For instance, during the HIV/AIDS and Ebola crises in Africa, important health sector reforms were initiated at the national, local government, and community levels. Likewise, the series of macroeconomic crises of the 1980s and 1990s led to an improved macroeconomic policy environment in in many countries that led to vibrant economic performance in from 1995 through 2008.
After the immediate crisis abates and the necessary economic and social adjustments are made, African economies must move as quickly as possible to regain lost GDP, jobs, revenues, investments, and productivity. This paper is targeted specifically to forward-looking policies. It is intended not to replace important emergency measures that save lives but rather to protect the future.
What follows are ten key transformative policy priorities for Africa in the aftermath of the pandemic: economic “rebound” measures that will help position economies for a more rapid and sustainable period of growth. The policy recommendations are grouped in four areas: resource mobilization and management; governance, effectiveness, and transparency; business and investment environment; and digital innovation and entrepreneurship.
While there are many policy considerations across all sectors—first and foremost in public health, which is widely understood and not included here—the actions emphasized below provide a balanced approach for both immediate relief and longer term economic transformation. They are not necessarily new recommendations; in many cases these are actions that should be taken regardless of the pandemic. But now, they are more critical than ever to recapture the gains lost—and to keep the transformation agenda on track.
4 Comments
Very useful framework. Going forward it would be interesting and instructive to compare how different countries manage their way out of this situation. For example, do resource-rich countries like Nigeria and Botswana bounce back more quickly than countries with a heavy reliance on VAT and other consumption based approaches? What sectors – other than health – are most effected? And someone made the point about access to credit for SME… what sources were tapped? Lots of room for follow-up analysis. Thenks
Thanks John,
Your comments are very pertinent. We are working with COVID-19 national task forces and indeed hope to see the different approaches and their impact. Natural resource consumption is valid, as is taxation and other domestic resource mobilization approaches – but also regional market linkages, the ability to keep SMEs going through the crisis (including access to finance), etc. And there are other interesting angles for research, such as how far some countries may “formalize” the informal sector, introduce incentives and policies for 4IR industries, etc.
Very relevant policy recommendations. However, I think its application needs to be sector specific with some variation. For instance, in the extractive sector charging VAT on big ticket exploration activities has been challenge. This VAT tends to constrain the exploration space. When these activities are exempted, it will be free fiscal space for companies to continue with exploration in the short to medium term thereby delineating additional mineral deposits to sustain mining operations. Activities to be exempted include laboratory sample analysis and drilling. VAT on these activities are huge and could be ploughed back into exploration. Even though this expenditure is capitalized and deducted when a mineral deposit is delineated, it deprives companies the fiscal space to explore additional areas which could increase the probability of finding a mineral deposit. Thus, in times of black swan events, it is advisable that Governments consider addressing this challenge.
Thank you very much for your comment. You are correct that in some instances, and depending on the recommendation, there will be sector specific variations, and the policy recommendations will be applied differently in each country. ACET hopes to work with national COVID-19 task forces across Africa to help countries prioritize and to determine what additional research is needed to apply the recommendations to different country conditions. Your argument on exemptions and “corporate fiscal space” would apply across many sectors and one could argue that most corporate executives would welcome such policy action. But such policies must be balanced with government fiscal space needs as well, which are severely constrained at the present time. Likewise, given current circumstances, government incentive programs may be most effective when focused on the largest employment sectors, informal sectors, small and medium enterprises, agricultural industries, innovative sectors, and those employing large numbers of youth. That said, the extractive sector is hugely important for many African economies, from off-shore gas to precious metals, and hence ensuring those industries survive through the pandemic, and thrive after the pandemic is critical.